<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux-fied.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theantidj.net/archives/65/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theantidj.net/archives/65</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The AntiDJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theantidj.net/archives/65#comment-6347</link>
		<dc:creator>The AntiDJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theantidj.net/archives/65#comment-6347</guid>
		<description>Well, as I understand it, the issue is that the wireless card makers don't release the information that is needed to the open source community so that can can make drivers.  That means most of the drivers that there are have been reversed engineered from windows drivers, which is why they are buggy.  The networking companies don't release the info, because, well, I'm not really sure.  Maybe just because they're lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as I understand it, the issue is that the wireless card makers don&#8217;t release the information that is needed to the open source community so that can can make drivers.  That means most of the drivers that there are have been reversed engineered from windows drivers, which is why they are buggy.  The networking companies don&#8217;t release the info, because, well, I&#8217;m not really sure.  Maybe just because they&#8217;re lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek C. F. Pegritz</title>
		<link>http://www.theantidj.net/archives/65#comment-6338</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek C. F. Pegritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theantidj.net/archives/65#comment-6338</guid>
		<description>Good luck with getting that wireless card to work. I'll bet you a Heineken it NEVER works under any version of Linux.

I was dual-booting Ubuntu on my laptop for a while, and was never able to get the built-in wireless card to work. Mind you, this was an extremely generic, run-of-the-mill card (I forget the manufacturer offhand, but I do recall that it was &lt;em&gt;the&lt;/em&gt; first name to pop up when I googled "generic wireless card adapter")...which means that there's almost certainly a working Linux driver for it &lt;em&gt;somewhere&lt;/em&gt; on the 'Net. Right? Nope. I found a bunch of drivers that people said &lt;em&gt;might&lt;/em&gt; work with it, but none of them did. I even had an old Linksys wifi card that I tried as well: there were "drivers" for it everywhere...yet none of them worked, either. Mind you, both cards worked fine--and still work fine--in WinXP.

All told, my experiences with Linux have been universally bad--mainly because of driver issues. Take this with a grain of salt, however, as this was last summer that I was doing this, and no doubt the situation has improved greatly since then, what with Ubuntu gaining in popularity so much in the past six months. Nonetheless, that Heiny bet stands. :)

I still find it very weird that there's so much trouble getting Linux to work with wifi cards. HOW many people are part of the Open Source development community these days? I could understand if there weren't drivers available for some esoteric piece of ultra-proprietary hardware whose driver specs are guarded more carefully than Fort Knox...but ultra-generic wifi card? Seriously, Double You Tee Eff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with getting that wireless card to work. I&#8217;ll bet you a Heineken it NEVER works under any version of Linux.</p>
<p>I was dual-booting Ubuntu on my laptop for a while, and was never able to get the built-in wireless card to work. Mind you, this was an extremely generic, run-of-the-mill card (I forget the manufacturer offhand, but I do recall that it was <em>the</em> first name to pop up when I googled &#8220;generic wireless card adapter&#8221;)&#8230;which means that there&#8217;s almost certainly a working Linux driver for it <em>somewhere</em> on the &#8216;Net. Right? Nope. I found a bunch of drivers that people said <em>might</em> work with it, but none of them did. I even had an old Linksys wifi card that I tried as well: there were &#8220;drivers&#8221; for it everywhere&#8230;yet none of them worked, either. Mind you, both cards worked fine&#8211;and still work fine&#8211;in WinXP.</p>
<p>All told, my experiences with Linux have been universally bad&#8211;mainly because of driver issues. Take this with a grain of salt, however, as this was last summer that I was doing this, and no doubt the situation has improved greatly since then, what with Ubuntu gaining in popularity so much in the past six months. Nonetheless, that Heiny bet stands. <img src='http://www.theantidj.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I still find it very weird that there&#8217;s so much trouble getting Linux to work with wifi cards. HOW many people are part of the Open Source development community these days? I could understand if there weren&#8217;t drivers available for some esoteric piece of ultra-proprietary hardware whose driver specs are guarded more carefully than Fort Knox&#8230;but ultra-generic wifi card? Seriously, Double You Tee Eff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
